화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.18, No.1, 29-37, January, 2012
Kinetic modeling and optimization of the operating condition of MTO process on SAPO-34 catalyst
E-mail:
In this paper, a new kinetic model for methanol to olefin process (MTO) over SAPO-34 catalyst was developed based on data obtained from a micro catalytic reactor using appropriate reaction network. The reaction rate equation has been introduced with consideration of reaction mechanism and the parameters were optimized on the experimental data by genetic algorithm. Comparing the experimental and predicted data showed that the predicted values from the presented model are well fitted to the experimental data. Using this kinetic model, the effect of most important operating conditions such as temperature, pressure, inlet water to methanol molar ratio and methanol space.time on the product distribution, has been examined. Finally, the optimal operating conditions for maximum production of the ethylene and the propylene were introduced.
  1. Eng CN, Arnold EC, Vora BV, The 1998 AIChE Spring National Meeting, Session 16, Fundamental Topics in Ethylene Production.
  2. Eng CN, Arnold EC, Vora BV, Fuglerud T, Kvisle S, Nilsen H, The 1998 AIChE Spring National Meeting, Session 45, Production of Liquid Fuels from Natural Gas.
  3. Vora BV, Marker TL, Barger PT, Fullerton HE, Nilson HP, Kvisle S, Fuglerud T, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 107, 87 (1997)
  4. Gayubo AG, Aguayo AT, Alonso A, Atutxa A, Bilbao J, Catal. Today, 106(1-4), 112 (2005)
  5. Pop G, Musca G, Ivanescu D, Pop E, Mari G, Chirila E, Muntean O, In: Albright LF, Crynes BL, Nowak S (Ed.), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 443 (1992)
  6. Bos AN, Tromp PJ, Akse HN, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34(11), 3808 (1995)
  7. Gayubo AG, Aguayo AT, del Campo AES, Tarrio AM, Bilbao J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(2), 292 (2000)
  8. Park TY, Froment GF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(20), 4172 (2001)
  9. Park TY, Froment GF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(20), 4187 (2001)
  10. Alwahabi SM, Froment GF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(17), 5098 (2004)
  11. Dahl IM, Kolboe S, Catal. Lett., 20, 329 (1993)
  12. Vera-Castaneda E, PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (1984)
  13. Gayubo AG, Aguayo AT, Castilla M, Moran AL, Bilbao J, Chem. Eng. Commun., 191(7), 944 (2004)
  14. Abraha M, PhD dissertation, Chem. Eng. Dept., Texas A&M University (2001)
  15. Marquardt DW, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 11, 431 (1963)
  16. Boozarjomehry RB, Masoori M, Chem. Eng. J., 130(1), 29 (2007)
  17. Evans M, Polanyi M, Trans. Faraday Soc., Inertia and driving force of chemical reactions, 31, 11 (1938)
  18. Maeder M, Neuhold YM, Puxty G, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., Lab. Inf. Manage., 70, 193 (2004)
  19. Lucasius CB, Kateman G, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 25, 99 (1994)
  20. Maeder M, Neuhold YM, Puxty G, King P, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 2836 (2003)
  21. Barkhordari A, Fatemi S, Daneshpayeh M, Zamani H, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 8, A81 (2010)
  22. Meyers RA, Handbook of Petrochemicals Production Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York (2005)