Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.29, No.9, 1135-1143, September, 2012
Development of a novel self-validating soft sensor
E-mail:
A self-validating soft sensor is proposed that not only can perform self-diagnostics and self-reconstruction, but also generate a variety of output data types, including the prediction values, input sensors status of soft sensor and the uncertainty values which represent the credibility of soft sensor’s output. The input sensors are validated before performing a prediction by principal components analysis (PCA) model. These validated data are then employed for subsequent recursive partial least square (RPLS) prediction. Other than input sensor validation and modeling for prediction, a t-statistic confidence interval is created and the status of input sensors is offered. By using this self-validating soft sensor, we can determine the work condition of the soft sensor and take proper actions in real time. The usefulness of the proposed method is demonstrated through a case study of a wastewater treatment process.
- Facco P, Doplicher F, Bezzo F, Barolo M, J. Process Control, 19(3), 520 (2009)
- Martens H, Hoy M, Westad F, Folkenberg D, Martens M, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems., 58, 151 (2001)
- Aguado D, Montoya T, Borras L, Seco A, Ferrer J, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence., 21, 919 (2008)
- Khayamian T, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems., 88, 35 (2007)
- Fortuna L, Graziani S, Xibilia MG, Control Engineering Practice., 13, 499 (2004)
- Alhoniemi E, Integrated Computer Aided Engineering., 6, 3 (1999)
- Yan WW, Shao HH, Wang XF, Comput. Chem. Eng., 28(8), 1489 (2004)
- Li WH, Yue HH, Valle-Cervantes S, Qin SJ, J. Process Control, 10(5), 471 (2000)
- Pessel N, Balmat JF, Latont F, Bonnal J, 9th WSEAS International Conference on Automatic Control, Modeling and Simulation, Istanbul, Turkish (2007)
- Doan DX, Tien X, Lim KW, Jun L, The 30th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Busan, South Korea (2004)
- Zhang F, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, U.S.A. (2004)
- Martin G, Chem. Eng. Prog., 93(7), 66 (1997)
- Qin SJ, Yue HY, Dunia R, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(5), 1675 (1997)
- Yue HH, Qin SJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(20), 4403 (2001)
- Ahmed F, Nazir S, Yeo YK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(1), 14 (2009)
- Ciba J, Dydo P, Tags KJ, Chemosphere., 76, 565 (2009)
- Facco P, Doplicher F, Bezzo F, Barolo M, J. Process Control, 19(3), 520 (2009)
- Mu SJ, Zeng YZ, Liu RL, Wu P, Su HY, Chu J, J. Process Control, 16(6), 557 (2006)
- Jackson JE, Mudholkar G, Technometrics., 21, 341 (1979)
- Qin SJ, Comput. Chem. Eng., 22(4-5), 503 (1998)
- Dunia R, Qin SJ, Edgar TF, Mcavoy TJ, AIChE J., 42(10), 2797 (1996)
- Kline S, McClintock F, Mech. Eng., 3, 8 (1853)
- Management TQ, Committee SSP, British Standards Institution, London, 3 (1995)
- Liu JL, Chen DS, Shen JF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(22), 11530 (2010)
- Blake CL, Merz CJ, UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases (1998)
- Rallo R, Ferre-Gine J, Giralt F, Report, Spain (1998)