In this work, we investigated the UV-vis spectra of the [Ru(bipy)(2)(MPyTPP)Cl](+) (MPyTPP = 5-pyridyl-15, 20,25-triphenylporphyrin) complex and its related species [Ru(bipy)(2)(py)Cl](+) and MPyTPP, by using time-dependent density functional theory and a set of functionals (B3LYP, M05, MPWB1K, and PBE0) in chloroform with the basis set 6-31++G-(d,p) for nonmetal atoms and the pseudopotential LANL2DZ for Ru. Practically no geometrical changes are observed in the Ru environment when py ligand is replaced by MPyTPP. This replacement favors the electronic redistribution from bipy ligands to Ru, and from the metal to MPyTPP ligand, as indicated by NBO analysis. We found that M05 functional predicts very well the UV-vis spectra, as it shows a low deviation with respect to the experimental data, with a maximum error of 0.19 eV (11 nm). M05 theoretical electronic spectrum of [Ru(bipy)(2)(MPyTPP)Cl](+) complex indicates that the presence of the Ru complex does not alter Q porphyrin bands, while charge transfer bands from Ru to bipy and porphyrin ligands mixes up in the region close to the porphyrin Soret band. Theoretical analysis allows the decomposition of this broad experimental band into specific ones identifying the Soret band and new metal to ligand charge transfers toward porphyrin at 425 and 478 am, which were not possible in none of the moieties MPyTPP and [Ru(bipy)(2)(Py)Cl](+) complex. In the UV region, the most intense intraligand band of bipy ligands becomes slightly blue-shifted both in the experimental and in the theoretical spectrum of [Ru(bipy)(2)(MPyTPP)Cl](+) complex compared to that in [Ru(bipy)(2)(py)Cl](+) complex. Some of the bands of [Ru(bipy)(2)(MPyTPP)Cl](+) showed in this theoretical study may have practical applications. That is the case for the band at 478 nm, with potential use in PDT, and those more energetic at 348 and 329 nm, which could help in the cleavage mechanism of DNA performed by this ruthenium complex.