- Previous Article
- Next Article
- Table of Contents
Applied Catalysis A: General, Vol.407, No.1-2, 231-237, 2011
Promotion effect of support calcination on ethanol production from CO hydrogenation over Rh/Fe/Al2O3 catalysts
A series of Rh/Fe/Al2O3 catalysts, in which the Al2O3 supports were calcined at different temperatures, were prepared by a sequential impregnation method. The catalysts were tested by CO hydrogenation and characterized by N-2 adsorption-desorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), CO pulse chemisorption, temperature programmed surface reaction (TPSR) and temperature programmed reduction (TPR) techniques. The activity of ethanol formation was the highest when the catalyst support was calcined at 800 degrees C, while that of methanol formation increased continuously with the calcination temperature of the support. According to the commonly accepted mechanism of C-2-oxygenates formation, CO conversion followed three separate pathways after CO dissociation, and our results suggested that the activity towards CO insertion and dissociation increased gradually with the calcination temperature, but began to decrease at 900 degrees C. On the other hand, direct hydrogenation of CO to methanol was still increasing at 900 degrees C. These observations were in agreement with TPSR results. Dispersion of the Rh or Fe species was not impaired, and even improved, with the declining of the surface area of the support due to high temperature calcination. TPR results revealed that Rh-Fe interaction was strengthened after calcination, due to a lowering in surface hydroxyl reactivity of the support and an increase of the Rh-Fe interface area. As a result, the amount of Rh-Fe-O sites for CO dissociation and insertion increased with the calcination temperature, giving rise to the increase in ethanol formation activity. However, an over-strong Rh-Fe interaction would be resulted when the catalyst support was calcined at 900 degrees C, and this would cause more Fe species to be reduced, which would then cover the Rh sites. Consequently. CO uptake as well as dissociation and insertion of CO would decrease, leading to more CO molecules being hydrogenated directly to methanol, thus causing a decrease in the selectivity of ethanol formation. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.