| 1 |
Spillover as a cause of bias in baseline evaluation methods for demand response programs
Todd A, Cappers P, Spurlock CA, Jin L
Applied Energy, 250, 344, 2019 |
| 2 |
Are vulnerable customers any different than their peers when exposed to critical peak pricing: Evidence from the US
Cappers P, Spurlock CA, Todd A, Jin L
Energy Policy, 123, 421, 2018 |
| 3 |
An assessment of market and policy barriers for demand response providing ancillary services in US electricity markets
Cappers P, MacDonald J, Goldman C, Ma O
Energy Policy, 62, 1031, 2013 |
| 4 |
An assessment of the role mass market demand response could play in contributing to the management of variable generation integration issues
Cappers P, Mills A, Goldman C, Wiser R, Eto JH
Energy Policy, 48, 420, 2012 |
| 5 |
Demand response in US electricity markets: Empirical evidence
Cappers P, Goldman C, Kathan D
Energy, 35(4), 1526, 2010 |
| 6 |
Financial impact of energy efficiency under a federal combined efficiency and renewable electricity standard: Case study of a Kansas "super-utility"
Cappers P, Goldman C
Energy Policy, 38(8), 3998, 2010 |
| 7 |
Customer response to RTP in competitive markets: A study of Niagara Mohawk's standard offer tariff
Boisvert RN, Cappers P, Goldman C, Neenan B, Hopper N
Energy Journal, 28(1), 53, 2007 |
