1 - 11 |
The role of membrane processes in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse Wintgens T, Melin T, Schafer A, Khan S, Muston M, Bixio D, Thoeye C |
13 - 20 |
Towards a better characterisation and understanding of membrane fouling in water treatment Jacquemet V, Gaval G, Rosenberger S, Lesjean B, Schrotter JC |
21 - 26 |
Effect of membrane pore size, coagulation time, and coagulant dose on virus removal by a coagulation-ceramic microfiltration hybrid system Matsushita T, Matsui Y, Shirasaki N, Kato Y |
27 - 40 |
Wastewater reclamation by the PAC-NF process Meier J, Melin T |
41 - 49 |
Application of a combined UF/RO system for the reuse of filter backwash water from treated swimming pool water Reissmann FG, Schulze E, Albrecht V |
51 - 62 |
Direct ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: comparison between filtration of raw sewage and primary clarifier effluent Ravazzini AM, van Nieuwenhuijzen AF, van der Graaf JHMJ |
63 - 72 |
Foulant analysis of modified and unmodified membranes for water and wastewater treatment with LC-OCD Batsch A, Tyszler D, Brugger A, Panglisch S, Melin T |
73 - 83 |
Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: fractionation of NOM in surface water and characterisation by LC-OCD Kennedy MD, Chun HK, Yangali VAQ, Heijman BGJ, Schippers JC |
85 - 93 |
Understanding natural organic matter fouling in low-pressure membrane filtration Lee N, Amy G, Lozier J |
95 - 105 |
Estrogenic trace contaminants in wastewater - possibilities of membrane bioreactor technology Lyko S, Wintgens T, Melin T |
107 - 113 |
Factors affecting removal of pharmaceutical substances and estrogens in membrane separation bioreactors Urase T, Kagawa C, Kikuta T |
115 - 124 |
Filtration characterisation for assessing MBR performance: three cases compared Evenblij H, Geilvoet S, van der Graaf JHJM, van der Roest HF |
125 - 134 |
Modelling approaches for filtration processes with novel submerged capillary modules in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment Geissler S, Wintgens T, Melin T, Vossenkaul K, Kullmann C |
135 - 140 |
Removal of pharmaceutical compounds by submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs) Kimura K, Hara H, Watanabe Y |
141 - 148 |
New process for treatment of organically fouled water: experiences with WWTP effluent Roorda JH, Wortel NC, van Dalen R |
149 - 159 |
Removal and fouling mechanisms in nanofiltration of polysaccharide solutions Broeckmann A, Wintgens T, Schafer AI |
161 - 169 |
Implication of various membranes to remove NOM typically occurring in Korea with respect to DBP, AOC and transport parameters Park N, Kwon B, Sun M, Ahn H, Kim C, Kwoak C, Lee D, Chae S, Hyung H, Cho J |
171 - 178 |
Studies on nanofiltration membrane fouling in the treatment of water solutions containing humic acids Wang Z, Zhao YY, Wang JX, Wang SC |
179 - 192 |
A nanofiltration retention model for trace contaminants in drinking water sources Cornelissen ER, Verdouw J, Gijsbertsen-Abrahamse AJ, Hofman JAMH |
193 - 201 |
Manipulating filterability of MBR activated sludge by pulsed substrate addition Evenblij H, Verrecht B, van der Graaf JHJM, Van der Bruggen B |
203 - 210 |
Removal of inorganic charged micropollutants in an ion-exchange membrane bioreactor Velizarov S, Matos C, Reis M, Crespo J |
211 - 218 |
Denitrification of drinking water sources by advanced biological treatment using a membrane bioreactor Buttiglieri G, Malpei F, Daverio E, Melchiori M, Nieman H, Ligthart J |
219 - 225 |
Sequencing anoxic/anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAM) pilot plant for advanced wastewater treatment Cho JW, Song KG, Lee SH, Ahn KH |
227 - 232 |
Blending brackish water with desalted seawater as an alterative to brackish water desalination Glueckstern P, Priel M, Kotzer E |
233 - 246 |
Post-treatment design of seawater reverse osmosis plants: boron removal technology selection for potable water production and environmental control Bick A, Oron G |
247 - 260 |
Basic options and two case studies for retrofitting hollow fiber elements by spiral-wound RO technology Gorenflo A, Redondo JA, Reverberi F |
261 - 271 |
Performance restoration and autopsy of NF membranes used in seawater pretreatment Al-Amoudi AS, Farooque AM |
273 - 286 |
Comparison of the performance of hollow fine fiber and spiral-wound membranes in the Al-Jubail SWRO desalination plant Al-Mobayed AS, Mubeen FM, Balaji S |
287 - 294 |
Comparison of membrane permeability and a fouling mechanism by pre-ozonation followed by membrane filtration and residual ozone in membrane cells Lee S, Lee K, Wan WM, Choi YS |
295 - 301 |
Heterogeneous fouling in dead-end ultrafiltration Heijman SGJ, Kennedy MD, van Hek GJ |
303 - 312 |
Nanofiltration concentrate disposal: experiences in the Netherlands Nederlof MM, van Paassen JAM, Jong R |
313 - 324 |
Worlds largest spiral element - history and development Antrim B, Lesan R, Liu B, von Gottberg A |
325 - 331 |
Optiflux((R)): from innovation to realisation van Paassen JAM, van der Meer WGJ, Post J |
333 - 341 |
Treatment of textile plant effluent by nanofiltration and/or reverse osmosis for water reuse Suksaroj C, Heran M, Allegre C, Persin F |
343 - 349 |
Nanofiltration of textile industry wastewater using a physicochemical process as a pre-treatment Bes-Pia A, Iborra-Clar MI, Iborra-Clar A, Mendoza-Roca JA, Cuartas-Uribe B, Alcaina-Miranda MI |
351 - 359 |
Purification of pulp and paper wastewater, with membrane technology, for water reuse in a closed loop Pizzichini A, Russo C, Di Meo C |
361 - 367 |
Application of membrane technology for the treatment of effluent from a zirconium silicate production process Sancho M, Arnal JM, Pineda A, Catala R, Lora J |