화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.24, No.3, 163-170, September, 2012
Optimal determination of rheological parameters for herschel-bulkley drilling fluids using genetic algorithms (GAs)
E-mail:
The rheological properties of a drilling fluid directly affect flow characteristics and hydraulic performance. Drilling fluids containing bentonite mixtures exhibit non-Newtonian rheological behavior which can be described with a high degree of accuracy by the three-parameter Herschel-Bulkley (HB) model. To determine the HB parameters, standard statistical techniques, such as the non-linear regression (NL) method are routinely used. However, sometimes they provide non physically acceptable solutions which could produce wrong values of the significant hydraulic parameters which affect drilling operations. To obtain more accurate results, the Golden Section (GS) method was subsequently developed by Kelessidis et al. (2006). In this work a different technique was developed using the Genetic Algorithms (GAs) to provide an easy-touse tool in order to determine the three parameters of the Herschel.Bulkley model more accurately. To evaluate the accuracy of the GAs method, experimental viscometric data sets of drilling fluids were taken from the literature and the results were compared with the ones obtained by using the NL and GS techniques. The results show that the GAs and the GS methods provide similar results with very high correlation coefficients and small sum of square errors for most of the samples exhibiting negative yield stress values by the NL technique, while giving similar to the NL technique for the samples that were predicted with positive yield stress. However, in some cases, the GAs method gives better and more realistic results than the GS method.
  1. American Petroleum Institute (API), 2009, Recommended practice 13D . Rheology and hydraulics of oil well drilling fluids,API, Washington, USA.
  2. Bingham EC, Fluidity and Plasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York (1922)
  3. Bourgoyne AT, Chenevert ME, Millheim KK, Young FS, Applied drilling engineering. SPE Textbook Series, vol. 2. Richardson, TX. (1991)
  4. Briscoe BJ, Luckham PF, Ren SR, Philos.Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci., 348, 179 (1994)
  5. Bush MD, Carter JN, Application of a modified genetic algorithm to parameter estimation in the petroleum industry. In: Dagli C, Akay E, Philip-Chen CL, Fernandez B, Ghosh J, (Eds.), Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, vol. 6. ASME Press, New York. (1996)
  6. Casson N, Flow equation for pigment oil suspensions of the printing ink type. In: Mills CC (Ed.), Rheology of Disperse Systems. Pergamon Press, Oxford. (1959)
  7. Chauduri A, Wereley N, Radhakrishnan R, Choi SB, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures., 17, 261 (2006)
  8. Chauduri A, Wereley N, Kotha S, Radhakrishnan R, Sudarshan TS, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials., 293, 206 (2005)
  9. Chipperfield A, Fleming P, Pohlheim H, Fonseca C, Genetic algorithm toolbox, Version 1.2 User’s Guide. (2007)
  10. Fordham EJ, Bittleston SH, Tehrani MA, Ind. Eng.Chem. Res., 29, 517 (1991)
  11. Goldberg D, Genetic Algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. (1989)
  12. Guan Z, Jiang Y, Tanabashi Y, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology., 24, 250 (2009)
  13. Hemphil T, Campos W, Pilehvari A, Oil Gas J., 91, 45 (1993)
  14. Herschel WH, Bulkley R, Kolloid-Z., 39, 291 (1926)
  15. Holland JH, Adaptation in natural and artificial Systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. (1975)
  16. Kelessidis VC, Maglione R, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physico Chemic. Eng. Aspects., 318, 217 (2008)
  17. Kelessidis VC, Maglione R, Tsamantaki C, Aspirtakis Y, J. Pet.Sci. Eng., 53, 203 (2006)
  18. Kelessidis VC, Papanicolaou C, Foscolos A, Int. J. Coal Geol., 77(3-4), 394 (2009)
  19. Kelessidis VC, Tsamantaki C, Dalamarinis P, Appl. Clay Sci., 38, 86 (2007)
  20. Khataniar S, Chukwu GA, Hua X, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 11, 155 (1994)
  21. Kok MV, Batmaz T, Gucuyener IH, Petroleum Science and Technology., 18(5 & 6), 519 (2000)
  22. Maglione R, Ferrario G, Oil and Gas J., 63, 63 (1996)
  23. Maglione R, Romagnoli R, GEAM Bulletin of the Polytechnic of Turin., 94, 123 (1998)
  24. Man KF, Tang KS, Kwong S, IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics., 43, 519 (1996)
  25. Michalewicz Z,Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, 3rd edition, Springer - Verlag, New York, 387 (1996)
  26. Nguyen QD, Boger DV, J. Rheol., 27, 321 (1983)
  27. Power D, Zamora M, Drilling fluid yield stress: measurement techniques for improved understanding of critical drilling fluid parameters, AADE-03-NTCE-35. AADE Technology Conf, Houston, TX, Apr., 1 (2003)
  28. Robertson RE, Stiff HA, SPE J., 16, 31 (1976)
  29. Velez-Langs O, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering., 47, 15 (2005)
  30. Wolf D, Moros R, Chem. Eng. Sci., 52(7), 1189 (1997)
  31. Zamora M, Power D, Making a case for AADE hydraulics and the unified rheological model, AADE-02-DFWH-HO-13. AADE Technology Conf, Houston, TX, Apr., 2 (2002)