화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, Vol.55, No.3, 409-418, June, 2017
DOI10.9713/kcer.2017.55.3.409  Export Citation
자가치유성을 갖는 고분자개질 방수아스팔트-몬모릴로나이트 composite 제조: 2. 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane에 의한 몬모릴로나이트(K-10)의 실란화 최적화 검증
Preparation of Self-repairing Polymer-modified Waterproofing Asphalt-montmorillonite Composite: 2. Validation of Optimized Silylation of Montmorillonite (K-10) Using 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane
이은주, 이종훈, 임광희†
  • 대구대학교 화학공학과, 38453 경상북도 경산시 진량읍 대구대로 201
Eun Ju Lee, Jong Hoon Lee, and Kwang-Hee Lim†
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Daegu University, 201, Daegudae-ro, Jillyang-eup, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 38453, Korea
E-mail:
초록
자가치유성을 갖는 고분자개질 빙수아스팔트-몬모릴로나이트(MMT) composite 제조를 위하여 양이온(Na+)교환 처리된 K-10 (Na-MMT-K)에 대한 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APS) 개질의 특성을 규명하고 적정개질조건을 FTIR, XRD, NMR 및 TGA 등의 분석을 통하여 제시되었다. APS 개질된 Na-MMT-K (S-Na-MMT-K)에 대한 FTIR 분석에 서 실란화 반응과 관련된 실록산 결합(Si-O), 아민기, -CH2- 및 -OH 기의 피크의 세기를 비교하였다. 그 결과로서 적 정 반응시간, 적정교반시간, 적정농도 및 적정반응온도는 각각 2~3 h, 20 min, 7.5 w/v% 및 50 °C가 도출되었다. 또한 TGA 결과로부터 도출된 적정개질조건도 FTIR 분석에서 도출한 적정개질조건과 거의 일치하였다. 이 도출된 적정개 질조건들은 Lee 등의 XRD 분석에서 제시된 기준(criterion)에 의해 도출된 적정반응시간, 적정교반시간, 적정 APS농 도 및 적정반응온도와 거의 일치하였다. 따라서 XRD 분석에서 제시된 기준(criterion)이 검증되었다.
In preparation of self-repairing polymer-modified waterproofing asphalt-montmorillonite (MMT) composite, silylation-modification charcteristics of cation (Na+) exchanged K-10 (Na-MMT-K) using 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APS) were studied and the optimal conditions of its silylation-modification process were proposed by use of the results of instrumental analysis, including FTIR, XRD, NMR and TGA, on silylation-modified Na-MMT-K (S-Na-MMT-K) under various conditions. According to FTIR analysis on S-Na-MMT-K, its peak-strengths of Si-O, -NH2, -CH2- and -OH, correlated with APS silylation-modification reaction, were compared each other. As a result, its optimal conditions including APS-MMT reacting period, APS-stirring period prior to APS-MMT reaction, APS concentration and reaction temperature were turned out to be 2~3 h, 20 min, 7.5 w/v% and 50 °C, respectively. In addition, the optimal conditions induced from the results of TGA were also nearly consistent to those according to the results of FTIR analyses. These optimal conditions were turned out to be almost consistent to those drawn according to a criterion from XRD results suggested previously by Lee et al., by which the criterion was validated.
Keywords:Montmorillonite;Silylation-modification;Optimal condition;Validation
  1. Zulfiqar S, Kausar A, Rizwan M, Sarwar MI, Appl. Surf. Sci., 255(5), 2080 (2008)
  2. Pavlidou S, Papaspyrides CD, Prog. Polym. Sci, 33, 1119 (2008)
  3. Bergaya F, Lagaly G, Appl. Clay Sci., 19, 1 (2001)
  4. Paiva LB, Morales AR, Diaz FRV, Appl. Clay Sci., 42, 8 (2008)
  5. Frost RL, He H, Xi Y, Kloprogge JT, Zhou Q, Martens WN, Yuan P, Clay Clay Min., 54(6), 689 (2006)
  6. Bandpei AM, Mohseni SM, Sheikhmohammadi A, Sardar M, Sarkhosh M, Almasian M, Avazpour M, Mosallanejad Z, Atafar Z, Nazari S, SoheilaRezaei, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(2), 376 (2017)
  7. Kim SW, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 51(3), 382 (2013)
  8. Ray SS, Okamoto M, Prog. Polym. Sci, 28, 1539 (2003)
  9. Bikiaris D, Thermochim. Acta, 523(1-2), 25 (2011)
  10. Wang JC, Zheng XY, Hao WL, Xu N, Pan XC, Powder Technol., 221, 80 (2012)
  11. Xie W, Xie R, Pan WP, Hunter D, Koene B, Tan LS, Vaia R, Chem. Mater., 14, 4837 (2002)
  12. He HP, Duchet J, Galy J, Gerard JF, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 288(1), 171 (2005)
  13. Avila LR, de Faria EH, Ciuffi KJ, Nassar EJ, Calefi PS, Vicente MA, Trujillano R, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 341(1), 186 (2010)
  14. Guimaraes AMF, Ciminelli VST, Vasconcelos WL, Appl. Clay Sci., 42, 410 (2009)
  15. Park S, Kim BJ, Seo D, Rhee KY, Lyu YY, Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process., 526, 74 (2009)
  16. Piscitelli F, Posocco P, Toth R, Fermeglia M, Pricl S, Mensitieri G, Lavorgna M, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 351(1), 108 (2010)
  17. Shanmugharaj AM, Rhee KY, Ryu SH, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 298(2), 854 (2006)
  18. Shen W, He HP, Zhu JX, Yuan P, Frost RL, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 313(1), 268 (2007)
  19. Shen W, He H, Zhu J, Yuan P, Ma YH. Liang XL, Chin. Sci. Bull., 54, 265 (2009)
  20. Wu PX, Dai YP, Long H, Zhu NW, Jai P, Wu JH, Dang Z, Chem. Eng. J., 191, 288 (2012)
  21. Wypych F, “Chemical Modification of Clay Surfaces,” In: Wypych F, Satyanarayana KG, (Eds.), Clay Surfaces: Fundamentals and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1-56 (2004).
  22. He H, Tao Q, Zhu J, Yuan P, Shen W, Yang S, Appl. Clay Sci., 71, 15 (2013)
  23. Park M, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 65, 499 (2004)
  24. Bergaya F, Lagaly G, Appl. Clay Sci., 19, 1 (2001)
  25. Herrera NN, Letoffe JM, Putaux JL, David L, Bourgeat-Lami E, Langmuir, 20(5), 1564 (2004)
  26. Bertuoli PT, Piazza D, Scienza LC, Zattera AJ, Appl. Clay Sci., 87, 46 (2014)
  27. Lee EJ, Lee JH, Park YJ, Yoon YK, Lim KH, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 55(3), 401 (2017)
  28. Gianni AD, Amerio E, Monticelli O, Bongiovanni R, Appl. Clay Sci., 42, 116 (2008)
  29. Guimaraes AMF, Ciminelli VST, Vasconcelos W, Appl. Clay Sci., 42, 410 (2009)
  30. Xie Y, Hill CAS, Xiao Z, Militz H, Mai C, Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf., 41, 806 (2010)
  31. He HP, Guo JG, Xie XD, Lin HF, Li LY, Clay Clay Min., 37, 337 (2002)