화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Materials Research, Vol.27, No.12, 688-694, December, 2017
일축 압축하중 하 다공성 폴리우레탄폼의 재료비선형 거동 및 미세구조 변화
Material Nonlinear Behavior and Microstructural Transition of Porous Polyurethane Foam under Uniaxial Compressive Loads
E-mail:
Porous materials such as polymeric foam are widely adopted in engineering and biomedical fields. Porous materials often exhibit complex nonlinear behaviors and are sensitive to material and environmental factors including cell size and shape, amount of porosity, and temperature, which are influenced by the type of base materials, reinforcements, method of fabrication, etc. Hence, the material characteristics of porous materials such as compressive stress-strain behavior and void volume fraction according to aforementioned factors should be precisely identified. In this study, unconfined uniaxial compressive test for two types of closed-cell structure polyurethane foam, namely, 0.16 and 0.32 g/cm3 of densities were carried out. In addition, the void volume fraction of three different domains, namely, center, surface and buckling regions under various compressive strains (10%, 30 %, 50 % and 70 %) were quantitatively observed using Micro 3D Computed Tomography(micro-CT) scanning system. Based on the experimental results, the relationship between compressive strain and void volume fraction with respect to cell size, density and boundary condition were investigated.
  1. Bram M, Stiller C, Buchkremer HP, Stover D, Baur H, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2, 196 (2000)
  2. Davies G, Zhen S, J. Mater. Sci., 18, 1899 (1983)
  3. Ryshkewitch E, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 36, 65 (1953)
  4. Scheffler M, Colombo P, John Wiley & Sons, p. 33, M. S. a. P. Colombo, John Wiley & Sons, (2006).
  5. Cameron NR, Polymer, 46(5), 1439 (2005)
  6. Lotters J, Olthuis W, Veltink P, Bergveld P, J. Micromech. Microeng., 7, 145 (1997)
  7. Szivek JA, Thompson JD, Benjamin JB, J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech., 6, 125 (1995)
  8. Goods SH, Neuschwanger CL, Henderson CC, Skala DM, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 68(7), 1045 (1998)
  9. Allen R, Baldini N, Donofrio P, Gutman E, Keefe E, Kramer J, The American Society for Testing and Materials, (1998).
  10. Chapman JR, Harrington R, Lee K, Anderson P, Tencer AF, Kowalski D, J. Biomech. Eng. -Trans. ASME, 118, 391 (1996)
  11. Ashby M, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Math. Phys. Sci., 364, 15 (2006).
  12. Meille S, Lombardi M, Chevalier J, Montanaro L, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 32, 3959 (2012)
  13. Johansson B, Alderborn G, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 52, 347 (2001)
  14. Umezawa O, Metal, Ceramic and Polymeric Composites for Various Uses, from https://www.intechopen.com/books/metal-ceramic-and-polymeric-composites-forforvarious-uses/thermo-mechanical-treatment-of-glassballoon-dispersed-metal-matrix-composite.
  15. Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J, Biomaterials, 24, 1937 (2003)
  16. Poulikakos D, J. Fluid. Eng., 124, 263 (2002)
  17. Markaki A, Clyne T, Acta Mater., 49, 1677 (2001)
  18. Callcut S, Knowles J, J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. Med., 13, 485 (2002)
  19. Rice J, Cowin S, Bowman J, J. Biomech. Eng. -Trans. ASME, 21, 155 (1988)
  20. Kolsky H, Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 62, 676 (1949)
  21. Sarier N, Onder E, Thermochim. Acta, 510(1-2), 113 (2010)
  22. Sawbones Worldwide, from http://www.sawbones.com/products/bio/composite.aspx.
  23. ASTM D, American Society for Testing and Materials, New York, (2016).
  24. Goods S, Neuschwanger C, Whinnery L, MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive, 521 (1998).
  25. Yi F, Zhu Z, Zu F, Hu S, Yi P, Mater. Char., 47, 417 (2001)
  26. Hayes W, Carter D, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 10, 537 (1976)
  27. Subhash G, Liu Q, Gao XL, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 32, 1113 (2006)
  28. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Harley BA, Cambridge University Press, p. 44, Cambridge University Press, (2010).
  29. Shaw M, Sata T, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 8, 469 (1966)