화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.78, 352-363, October, 2019
DOI10.1016/j.jiec.2019.05.034  Export Citation
Alkali modified oak waste residues as a cost-effective adsorbent for enhanced removal of cadmium from water: Isotherm, kinetic, thermodynamic and artificial neural network modeling
Afshin Takdastan1, 2, Samira Samarbaf1, 2, Yaser Tahmasebi1, 2, Nadali Alavi3, 4, and Ali Akbar Babaei1, 2, †
  • 1Environmental Technologies Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • 2Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • 3Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 4Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
E-mail:
Heavy metals are kind of toxic substances which are abundant in all municipal, agricultural, industrial and treated wastewaters. In this research, a comparative study was carried out for adsorptive removal of Cd2+ from aqueous solution using raw oak waste and NaOH-activated oak waste at different experimental conditions namely, pH of solution (2.8), contact time (5.240 min), adsorbent dosages (0.1-10 g/L) and initial Cd2+ concentrations (25.100 mg/L). In addition, the experimental data of Cd2+ adsorption were fitted with different isotherm and kinetic models to determine the most appropriate model. Artificial neural network (ANN) model was also used to find the effect of each individual parameter on Cd2+ adsorptive removal. Based on the results of batch experiments, adsorbent dosages and initial Cd2+ concentrations had direct and indirect relationships with Cd2+ removal, respectively. Furthermore, among all applied isotherm and kinetic models, Langmuir isotherm model and Avrami fractional-order kinetic models could best-fitted with the experimental data of Cd2+ removal. The results of thermodynamic studies revealed that the adsorption of Cd2+ onto the surfaces of oak waste adsorbents is exothermic and spontaneous. Finally, according to the findings of ANN studies, this approach could model the role of each parameter on Cd2+ removal with high coefficient of correlation (>0.99). Accordingly, pH of solution and temperature had the highest and lowest influence on removal of Cd2+ from solution, respectively. The results implied that oak waste can be selected as a promising and environmentally friendly adsorbent for the effective remediation of water bodies containing heavy metals.
Keywords:Oak waste;Langmuir;Avrami functional-order;Sodium hydroxide;Batch experiments;ANN
  1. Carolin CF, Kumar PS, Saravanan A, Joshiba GJ, Naushad M, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 5, 2782 (2017)
  2. Leguizamo MAO, Gomez WDF, Sarmiento MCG, Chemosphere, 168, 1230 (2017)
  3. O'Connell DW, Birkinshaw C, O'Dwyer TF, Bioresour. Technol., 99(15), 6709 (2008)
  4. Sud D, Mahajan G, Kaur MP, Bioresour. Technol., 99(14), 6017 (2008)
  5. Organization WH, Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality: Recommendations, vol. 1, World Health Organization, 2004.
  6. Jeon C, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 58, 57 (2018)
  7. Chen Q, Zheng J, Wen L, Yang C, Zhang L, Chemosphere, 224, 509 (2019)
  8. Esalah JO, Weber ME, Vera JH, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 78(5), 948 (2000)
  9. Zioui D, Arous O, Mameri N, Kerdjoudj H, Sebastian MS, Vilas JL, Nunes-Pereira J, Lanceros-Mendez S, J. Hazard. Mat., 336, 188 (2017)
  10. Liu XJ, Wu JL, Liu C, Wang JL, Sep. Purif. Technol., 177, 8 (2017)
  11. Wong CW, Barford JP, Chen G, McKay G, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2, 698 (2014)
  12. Siyal AA, Shamsuddin MR, Khan MI, Rabat NE, Zulfiqar M, Man Z, Siame J, Azizli KA, J. Environ. Manage., 224, 327 (2018)
  13. Xiong W, Zeng Z, Li X, Zeng G, Xiao R, Yang Z, Zhou Y, Zhang C, Cheng M, Hu L, Zhou C, Qin L, Xu R, Zhang Y, Chemosphere, 210, 1061 (2018)
  14. Xiong WP, Tong J, Yang ZH, Zeng GM, Zhou YY, Wang DB, Song PP, Xu R, Zhang C, Cheng M, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 493, 17 (2017)
  15. Xiong W, Zeng G, Yang Z, Zhou Y, Zhang C, Cheng M, Liu Y, Hu L, Wan J, Zhou C, Xu R, Li X, Sci. Total Environ., 627, 235 (2018)
  16. Abdelfattah I, Ismail AA, Sayed FA, Almedolab A, Aboelghait KM, Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage., 6, 176 (2016)
  17. Pyrzynska K, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 7, 102795 (2019)
  18. Wang FT, Pan YF, Cai PX, Guo TX, Xiao HN, Bioresour. Technol., 241, 482 (2017)
  19. Toor M, Jin B, Dai S, Vimonses V, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 653 (2015)
  20. Kara A, Tekin N, Alan A, Safakl A, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 4, 1642 (2016)
  21. Anastopoulos I, Bhatnagar A, Hameed BH, Ok YS, Omirou M, J. Mol. Liq., 240, 179 (2017)
  22. Abaide ER, Dotto GL, Tres MV, Zabot GL, Mazutti MA, Bioresour. Technol., 284, 25 (2019)
  23. Dong J, Du Y, Duyu R, Shang Y, Zhang S, Han R, Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 6, 96 (2019)
  24. Sostaric TD, Petrovic MS, Pastor FT, Loncarevic DR, Pertrovic JT, Milojkovic JV, Stojanovic MD, J. Mol. Liq., 259, 340 (2018)
  25. Kumar A, Prasad B, Mishra IM, J. Water Process Eng., 2, 129 (2014)
  26. Pandiarajan A, Kamaraj R, Vasudevan S, Vasudevan S, Bioresour. Technol., 261, 329 (2018)
  27. Pholosi A, Naidoo EB, Ofomaja AE, Mater. Chem. Phys., 222, 20 (2019)
  28. Hong M, Yu LY, Wang YD, Zhang J, Chen ZW, Dong L, Zan QJ, Li RL, Chem. Eng. J., 359, 363 (2019)
  29. Ahsan MA, Katla SK, Islam MT, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Martinez LM, Diaz-Moreno CA, Lopez J, Singamaneni SR, Banuelos J, Gardea-Torresdey J, Noveron JC, Environ. Technol. Innov., 11, 23 (2018)
  30. Yin K, Wang QN, Lv M, Chen LX, Chem. Eng. J., 360, 1553 (2019)
  31. Ornek A, Ozacar M, Sengil IA, Biochem. Eng. J., 37, 192 (2007)
  32. Malkoc E, Nuhoglu Y, Sep. Purif. Technol., 54(3), 291 (2007)
  33. Ghaedi M, Hossainian H, Montazerozohori M, Shokrollahi A, Shojaipour F, Soylak M, Purkait MK, Desalination, 281, 226 (2011)
  34. Malkoc E, Nuhoglu Y, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 29, 297 (2010)
  35. Argun ME, Dursun S, Karatas M, Desalination, 249(2), 519 (2009)
  36. Esfahani AR, Hojati S, Azimi A, Farzadian M, Khataee A, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 49, 172 (2015)
  37. Khataee AR, Environ. Technol., 30, 1155 (2009)
  38. Khataee AR, Vahid B, Behjati B, Safarpour M, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 32, 557 (2013)
  39. Vilardi G, Di Palma L, Verdone N, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 26(3), 455 (2018)
  40. Rezakazemi M, Shirazian S, J. Mol. Liq., 274, 778 (2019)
  41. Syafiuddin A, Salmiati S, Jonbi J, Fulazzaky MA, J. Environ. Manage., 218, 59 (2018)
  42. Turan NG, Mesci B, Ozgonenel O, Chem. Eng. J., 171(3), 1091 (2011)
  43. Dutta S, Parsons SA, Bhattacharjee C, Bandhyopadhyay S, Datta S, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 8634 (2010)
  44. Khataee AR, Dehghan G, Ebadi A, Zarei M, Pourhassan M, Bioresour. Technol., 101(7), 2252 (2010)
  45. Ghaedi AM, Vafaei A, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 245, 20 (2017)
  46. Esfahani AR, Firouzi AF, Sayyad G, Kiasat A, Int. J. Agronomy Plant Prod., 4, 3444 (2013)
  47. Liu JY, Hu CW, Huang QG, Bioresour. Technol., 271, 487 (2019)
  48. Liu R, Lian B, Sci. Total Environ., 659, 122 (2019)
  49. Malkoc E, Nuhoglu Y, J. Hazard. Mater., 127(1-3), 120 (2005)
  50. Murugesan A, Ravikumar L, SathyaSelvaBala V, SenthilKumar P, Vidhyadevi T, Kirupha SD, Kalaivani SS, Krithiga S, Sivanesan S, Desalination, 271(1-3), 199 (2011)
  51. Basu M, Guha AK, Ray L, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 106, 11 (2017)
  52. Wu SB, Zhang KS, Wang XL, Jia Y, Sun B, Luo T, Meng FL, Jin Z, Lin DY, Shen W, Kong LT, Liu JH, Chem. Eng. J., 262, 1292 (2015)
  53. Balaz M, Bujnakova Z, Balaz P, Zorkovska A, Dankova Z, Briancin J, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 454, 121 (2015)
  54. Tan IAW, Chan JC, Hameed BH, Lim LLP, J. Water Process Eng., 14, 60 (2016)
  55. Hu JL, He XW, Wang CR, Li JW, Zhang CH, Bioresour. Technol., 121, 25 (2012)
  56. Park CM, Han J, Chu KH, Al-Hamadani YAJ, Her N, Heo J, Yoon Y, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 48, 186 (2017)
  57. Snoussi Y, Abderrabba M, Sayari A, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 66, 372 (2016)
  58. Chen T, Zhou Z, Han R, Meng R, Wang H, Lu W, Chemosphere, 134, 286 (2015)
  59. Bhanjana G, Dilbaghi N, Kim KH, Kumar S, J. Mol. Liq., 242, 966 (2017)
  60. Schiewer S, Wong MH, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 3821 (1999)
  61. Moreno-Perez J, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Reynel-Avila HE, Verde-Gomez Y, Trejo-Valencia R, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6, 5389 (2018)