화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, Vol.58, No.3, 325-345, June, 2020
DOI10.9713/kcer.2020.58.3.325  Export Citation
산업단지 VOC 저감 최적가용기법(BAT) 선정을 위한 다매체 거동모델 기반 인체위해성·환경성·경제성 평가
Human Health Risk, Environmental and Economic Assessment Based on Multimedia Fugacity Model for Determination of Best Available Technology (BAT) for VOC Reduction in Industrial Complex
김예린, 이가희, 허성구, 남기전, 리 첸, 유창규†
  • 경희대학교 공과대학 환경학 및 환경공학과, 17104 경기도 용인시 기흥구 덕영대로 1732
Yelin Kim, Gahee Rhee, Sungku Heo, Kijeon Nam, Qian Li, and ChangKyoo Yoo†
  • Department of Environmental Science and Engineering College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 1732, Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17104, Korea
E-mail:
초록
본 연구에서는 다매체 퓨가시티 모델을 기반으로 Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 방지기술의 인체위해성·환경성·경제성 평가를 수행하여 석유화학 산업단지 내 VOCs 저감을 위한 최적가용기법(Best available technology, BAT)을 선정하였다. 다매체 퓨가시티 모델을 이용하여 U-city에 소재한 석유화학 산업단지에서 배출되는 VOCs 중 Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene (BTEX)의 다매체 거동 특성과 잔류농도 분포를 예측하였다. 매체 통합 인체위해성 평가 및 민감도 분석을 이용해 BTEX의 물질별 인체위해성을 예측하고 주요 영향 변수를 규명하였으며, 다매체 환경시스템 내 잔류농도 기준의 환경성 평가와 비용-편익 경제성 평가를 수행하여 우수환경관리기법군(BAT군)을 선정하였다. BTEX의 다매체 거동 분석 결과, 토양 매체에서 높은 잔류 분포 특성(60%, 61%, 64%, 63%)을 보였으며, Xylene은 모든 다매체 환경에서 가장 높은 잔류성을 보였다. BAT후보군 중에서 흡수법은 가장 높은 인체위해성을 보여 BAT 선정에서 제외하였으며, 민감도 분석 결과 대기 매체에서의 물질 반감기와 경로별 노출계수가 인체위해성과 높은 상관성이 있는 것으로 판단되었다. 환경성 평가와 비용-편익 경제성 평가를 고려하여, 재생 열산화법, 재생 촉매산화법, 바이오필터법, UV 산화법, 활성탄 흡착법을 석유화학 산업단지 내 VOCs 저감을 위한 BAT군으로 선정하였으며, 본 연구에서 제시한 매체통합적 접근 방식의 BAT 선정 방법론은 사업장에서 오염물질 저감을 위한 최적의 배출시설 선정과 통합환경관리제도 운영에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.
Determination of Best available technology (BAT) was suggested to reduce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a petrochemical industrial complex, by conducting human health risk, environmental, and economic assessment based on multimedia fugacity model. Fate and distribution of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) was predicted by the multimedia fugacity model, which represent VOCs emitted from the industrial complex in U-city. Media-integrated human health risk assessment and sensitivity analysis were conducted to predict the human health risk of BTEX and identify the critical variable which has adverse effects on human health. Besides, the environmental and economic assessment was conducted to determine the BAT for VOCs reduction. It is concluded that BTEX highly remained in soil media (60%, 61%, 64% and 63%), and xylene has remained as the highest proportion of BTEX in each environment media. From the candidates of BAT, the absorption was excluded due to its high human health risk. Moreover, it is identified that the half-life and exposure coefficient of each exposure route are highly correlated with human health risk by sensitivity analysis. In last, considering environmental and economic assessment, the regenerative thermal oxidation, the regenerative catalytic oxidation, the bio-filtration, the UV oxidation, and the activated carbon adsorption were determined as BAT for reducing VOCs in the petrochemical industrial complex. The suggested BAT determination methodology based on the media-integrated approach can contribute to the application of BAT into the workplace to efficiently manage the discharge facilities and operate an integrated environmental management system.
Keywords:Integrated environmental management;Best available technology (BAT);VOCs control technology;Multimedia fugacity model;Cost-benefit analysis;Human risk assessment
  1. Shin YS, Env. L. P., 2, 145 (2009)
  2. Kim KY, Hong JS, Kim HY, Kwon OS, Spring Conference on Korea Society of Waste Management, 1, 27-30(2009).
  3. Han DH, Spring Conference on Korean Society on Water Environment & Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 2016, 625-626 (2016).
  4. Kim KY, Shin SJ, Moon HS, Jeon TW, and Shin SK, Journal of Korean Society of Urban Environment, 17(1), 109-117(2017).
  5. Lee CH, Moon HJ, Lee MS, Han DH, Seo EJ, Kim M, Jeong AY, Jeong SH, Ministry of Environment of Korea (2015).
  6. Lee CH, Spring Conference on Korean Society on Water Environment & Korean Society of Water and Wastewater (2000~), 2016, 623(2016).
  7. Park JH, J. Korean Soc. Water Environ., 33(3), 348 (2017)
  8. Yoo SJ, et al., National Institute of Environmental Research, NIER-GP2013-441(2013).
  9. A report from Industrial Skills Council (ISC, Republic of Korea) (2016).
  10. Yeo SY, Choi SW, Lee HK, Sul SH. Jin HA, Lim JH, National Institute of Environmental Research, NIER-GP2018-131(2019).
  11. Moon J, Lee K, Kim S, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 53(6), 755 (2015)
  12. Kang S, Lee H, Park Y, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 53(3), 339 (2015)
  13. Cohen Y, PA: ASTM International, 7-32 (1996).
  14. Choi YJ, Jeon EC, Kim KH, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 23(1), 110 (2007)
  15. Cha JS, Chung IR, Hong JH, Seok KS, Kim DG, Lee DG, and Kim JI, Air Pollution Engineering Division, NIER-2001-09-601(2001).
  16. Shin YS, Lee DS, Koo HJ, Korea Environment Institute, 2004, 1 (2004)
  17. Rhee GH, Hwangbo SB, Yoo CK, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 56(4), 479 (2018)
  18. Kim KM, Bae HK, Song SH, Koo HJ, Kim HM, Choi KS, Jeon SH, Lee MS, J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng., 27(10), 1090 (2005)
  19. Li Q, Kim MJ, Liu Y, Yoo CK, Sci. Total Environ., 618, 430 (2018)
  20. Mackay D, Multimedia Environmental Models: The Fugacity Approach, Second Edition, CRC Press(2001).
  21. Koo JH, Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate school, Pukyong National University(2005).
  22. Lee JH, Kim YS, Ryu YT, Yoo IS, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 13(4), 257 (1997)
  23. “Guidance for Risk Assessment” National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation(2007).
  24. NIER Notification No.2014-48 on Regulations on Methodology for Risk Assessment of Chemical Substance.
  25. Seo JK, Kim TS, Jeo AR, Kim PJ, Choi JH, Korean J. Environ. Health Sci., 40(5), 397 (2014)
  26. Kim CY, Roh JH, Won JW, Roh YM, Kim KY, Yang JY, Kim GY, Lee KJ, Yoo SH, Lee SY, Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute of Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency(2011).
  27. “Manual of Data on the Risk of Chemicals (2017),” National Institute of Environmental Research, NIER-GP2016-163(2017).
  28. Mukaka MM, Malawi Med. J., 24, 69 (2012)
  29. Kim JH, Kim JS, J. Korean Acad. of Rehab. Med., 22(1), 46-55(1998).
  30. https://icis.me.go.kr.
  31. https://www.nifds.go.kr/toxinfo/carcinogenicity/info/list.do.
  32. Kang JH, Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University (2003).
  33. Noordally E, Richmond JR, Tahir SF, Catal. Today, 17, 359 (1993)
  34. “2016 Chemical Emission Results Report,” A report from National Institute of Chemical Safety of Korea(2017).
  35. Choi JY, Joe SH, Kim JW, Lee MS, Han CK, Ko JW, Chun SH, Lee SM, Korea Environment Corporation(2013).
  36. Pinto R, Couso D, Contributions from Science Education Research [Electronic Resource], Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht(2007).
  37. A report from Integrated Risk Information System, United States Environmental Protection Agency(2005).
  38. A report from Integrated Risk Information System, United States Environmental Protection Agency(1987).
  39. A report from Integrated Risk Information System, United States Environmental Protection Agency(2003).
  40. A report from Integrated Risk Information System, United States Environmental Protection Agency(2000).
  41. https://Rais.ornl.gov/tox/profiles/benzene_ragsa.html.
  42. Kim TS, Seo JG, Yoon HJ, Jo AR, Kim JG, Kwon JT, Han HJ, Choi JH, Kim PJ, National Institute of Environmental Research, NIER-RP2013-129(2013).
  43. A report from Korea Environmental Industry Technology Institute(2015).
  44. Ministry of Environment, “A Study on the Reduction Efficiency and Concentration Criteria of VOC Emission Control and Prevention Facilities,” Seoul, Korea(2001).
  45. Son YS, Kim KJ, Kim JC, Asian J. Atoms. Environ., 4(2), 63 (2010)
  46. A report from Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service(2007).
  47. A report from Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service(2017).
  48. A report from Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service(1999).
  49. A report from Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service(2007).
  50. https://echa.europa.eu.
  51. A report from United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/8-91-011B(1992).
  52. Macleod M, Fraser AJ, Mackay D, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 21(4), 700 (2002)
  53. Jang JY, Jo SN, Kim SY, Kim SJ, Jung HK, Ministry of Environment of Korea(2007).
  54. Seo JG, Yoon HJ, Kim TS, Kim JH, Jo AR, Lee BW, Lim HW, Kim PJ, Choi KH, National Institute of Environmental Research(2016).
  55. Qu C, Li B, Wu H, Wang S, Giesy J, Environ. Geochem. Health, 37(3), 587 (2015)