화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.105, 58-62, January, 2022
Is mass-scale electrocatalysis of aqueous methanol an energetically and economically viable option for hydrogen production?
E-mail:
The use of primary alcohols (such as methanol) in the production of hydrogen (H2) has been spotlighted as one of the indispensable measures to pursue a greener economy. Here, we address some potential shortcomings concerning the production of H2 based on aqueous methanol electrolysis in reference to steam methane reforming (SMR) as a mature commercial technology. After all, is SMR an economic and low-energy route for H2 production? Is it feasible to use methanol to electrolytically generate H2? The liquid-phase methanol-based hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at 335 K is an example of a potentially entropy driven reaction (exoergic, even though very endothermic) with a suitable catalyst using either ambient or waste heat. Further, would it be more efficient to use methane as a source of hydrogen via SMR or consume it directly as energy? The suitability of HER is assessed in the context of industrial energy analysis, thermodynamics, and sustainability.
  1. IEA International Energy Agency - Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050), 2021.
  2. Ewan BCR, Allen RWK, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 30(8), 809 (2005)
  3. Kim JE, Zhang YH, Percival, Use of Carbohydrates for Hydrogen Storage, Compendium of Hydrogen Energy, Woodhead Publishing, pp.219, 2016.
  4. BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, 69th ed., 2020.
  5. Chong ZR, Yang SHB, Babu P, Linga P, Li XS, Appl. Energy, 162, 1633 (2016)
  6. Yang MJ, Fu Z, Jiang LL, Song YC, Appl. Energy, 187, 180 (2017)
  7. Roszak R, Firlej L, Roszak S, Pfeifer P, Kuchta B, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 496, 67 (2016)
  8. Hurst K, Gennett T, Adams J, et al., ChemphysChem, 20, 1997 (2019)
  9. Laitinen HA, Anal. Chem., 45, 2305 (1973)
  10. NIST, NIST Chemistry WebBook - NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, 2020.
  11. IPCC-5AR, IPCC 5th Assessment Synthesis Report, Climate Change 2014, 2015.
  12. Szulejko JE, Kumar P, Deep A, Kim KH, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 8, 136 (2017)
  13. Hosseini SE, Wahid MA, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 57, 850 (2016)
  14. Ofgem, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets: All wholesale gas charts and indicators, 2020.
  15. Lindzen RS, J. Am. Phys. Surgeons, 18, 70 (2013)
  16. Rorsch A, Humanities, 3, 442 (2014)
  17. Markandya A, Wilkinson P, Lancet, 370, 979 (2007)
  18. Waeber PO, Stoudmann N, Langston JD, Ghazoul J, Wilme L, Sayer J, Nobre C, Innes JL, Fernbach P, Sloman SA, Garcia CA, Sustainability, 13, 3578 (2021)
  19. Njoh AJ, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 147 (2021)
  20. Mahesh KN, Balaji R, Dhathathreyan KS, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 41(1), 46 (2016)
  21. Ruiz-Lopez E, Caravaca A, Vernoux P, Dorado F, de Lucas-Consuegra A, Chem. Eng. J., 125217 (2020).