화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.91, 79-84, November, 2020
Highly porous and thermally stable cellulose acetate to utilize hydrated glycerin
E-mail:,
In this study, nano-pores in cellulose acetate matrix were generated by utilizing glycerin with water pressure without metal salts as additive. When cellulose acetate polymer membrane fabricated with glycerin as an additive was exposed to water pressure as external physical force, nano-pore generation depends on the pressure-strength exerted on the membrane. On the principle of the nano-pore generation, the chains became weakened in the portion of the cellulose acetate, in which glycerin was surrounded by abundant water molecules, resulting in plasticization capable of easily generating nano-pores with water pressure. We found that pore size and numbers of nano-pore could be easily controlled by adjusting the water pressure. Thus, we succeeded in preparing the porous cellulose acetate with high porosity of 78.3%.Generated pores in cellulose acetate polymers were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and porosimeter. The coordinate interactions between cellulose acetate (CA) polymers and glycerin were investigated by FT-IR and TGA analysis.
  1. Chao X, Zhang H, Xu S, Wang Y, AIChE J., 65(8), 16620 (2019)
  2. Qiao ZH, Sheng ML, Wang JX, Zhao S, Wang Z, AIChE J., 65(1), 239 (2019)
  3. Bilevych Y, Brunner SE, Chan HW, Charbon E, Graaf HV, Hagen CW, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 809, 171 (2016)
  4. Moradi MR, Pihlajamaki A, Hesampour M, Ahlgren J, Manttari M, J. Membr. Sci., 584, 300 (2019)
  5. Gao W, Zhou T, Gao Y, Wang Q, Appl. Energy, 254, 113700 (2019)
  6. Liang X, Yang Y, Jie X, Cheng J, J. Mater. Sci. Tech., 32, 200 (2016)
  7. Yang K, Li J, Zhou L, Zhang T, Fu L, FlatChem, 15, 100109 (2019)
  8. Kim JH, Gu M, Lee DH, Kim JH, Oh YS, Min SH, Kim BS, Lee SY, Nano Lett., 9, 5533 (2016)
  9. Lu SW, Liu JM, Wang ZH, Ma H, Li CY, Zhao N, Wang S, J. Environ. Sci., 80, 169 (2019)
  10. Sun Q, Aguila B, Ma S, Trends Chem., 1, 292 (2019)
  11. Wang XF, Song XZ, Sun KM, Cheng L, Ma W, Polyhedorn, 152, 155 (2018)
  12. Gao LY, Su KM, Fan TT, Li ZH, Polymer, 176, 274 (2019)
  13. Maleh MS, Raisi A, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 147, 545 (2019)
  14. Meng Y, Shu L, Liu L, Wu Y, Xie LH, Zhao MJ, Li JR, J. Membr. Sci., 591, 117360 (2019)
  15. Qiu WJ, An CH, Yan YW, Xu J, Zhang ZJ, Guo W, Wang Z, Zheng ZJ, Wang ZB, Deng QB, Li JS, J. Power Sources, 423, 98 (2019)
  16. Li JM, Hu CS, Shao JM, Li HJ, Li PY, Li XC, He WD, Polymer, 119, 152 (2017)
  17. Almojjly A, Johnson D, Hilal N, J. Water Process Eng., 31, 100868 (2019)
  18. Lee WG, Kang SW, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 70, 103 (2019)
  19. Lee WG, Hwang J, Kang SW, Chem. Eng. J., 284, 37 (2016)
  20. Kim HY, Cho YH, Kang SW, Eng. Chem., 78, 421 (2019)
  21. Lee WG, Kang SW, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 25, 103 (2019)
  22. Lee WG, Kim DH, Jeon WC, Kwak SK, Kang SJ, Kang SW, Sci. Rep., 7, 1287 (2017)
  23. Zhao D, Zhu Y, Cheng W, Chen C, Yu H, Hu L, Matter, 2, 390 (2020)