화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.18, No.1, 15-24, March, 2006
Yield stress measurements in suspensions: an inter-laboratory study
E-mail:
The first international inter-laboratory study, involving six laboratories, has been conducted to examine issues associated with yield stress measurements in suspensions. The initial focus of the project was to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of several common yield stress measuring techniques employed in different laboratories and with different instruments. Aqueous suspensions of colloidal TiO2 at concentrations of 40-70 wt% solids were used as the test fluids. A wide range of instruments and techniques employing both direct and indirect methods were used to determine the yield stress of the samples prepared according to a prescribed procedure. The results obtained indicated that although variations of results existed among different techniques, direct yield stress measurements using static methods produced more reliable and repeatable results than other methods. Variability of the yield stress measured using different techniques within any laboratory however was less significant than variability of the results among different laboratories. The nature and condition of the test suspensions was identified as the most likely factor responsible for the poor reproducibility of yield stress measurements from different laboratories.
  1. American Society for Testing Materials, Standard practice for conducting interlaboratory study to determine the precision of a test method, ASTM Standard E691-99 (1999)
  2. Barnes HA, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 81(1-2), 133 (1999) 
  3. Cheng DCH, Rheol. Acta, 25, 542 (1986) 
  4. Coussot P, Boyer S, Rheol. Acta, 34(6), 534 (1995) 
  5. Coussot P, Nguyen QD, Huynh HT, Bonn D, J. Rheol., 46(3), 573 (2002) 
  6. James AE, Williams DJA, Williams PR, Rheol. Acta, 26, 437 (1987) 
  7. Liddell PV, Boger DV, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 63(2-3), 235 (1996) 
  8. Nguyen QD, Boger DV, J. Rheol., 27, 321 (1983) 
  9. Nguyen QD, Boger DV, J. Rheol., 29, 335 (1985) 
  10. Nguyen QD, Boger DV, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 24, 47 (1992) 
  11. Steffe JF, Rheological Methods on Food Process Engineering, 2nd ed., Freeman Press, East Lancing (1996)
  12. Uhlherr PHT, Guo J, Fang TN, Tiu C, Korea-Aust. Rheol. J., 14(1), 17 (2002)
  13. Uhlherr PHT, Guo J, Tiu C, Zhang XM, Zhou JZQ, Fang TN, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 125(2-3), 101 (2005) 
  14. Zhu LX, Sun N, Papadopoulos K, De Kee D, J. Rheol., 45(5), 1105 (2001) 
  15. Zhu LX, Papadopoulos K, De Kee D, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 80(6), 1175 (2002)