화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.15, No.2, 157-162, March, 2009
An analysis method for degradation kinetics of lowly concentrated PAH solutions under UV light and ultrasonication
E-mail:
Degradation of lowly concentrated PAHs with small numbered aromatic rings has been investigated in aspect of kinetics under irradiation energy such as UV and ultrasonication. The conventional kinetic analysis for both of phenanthrene and pyrene showed that their degradation simply followed a pseudo first order reaction regime at the low bulk concentrations of the PAHs. Meanwhile, overall reaction orders estimated on a basis of half-life time were 0th for phenanthrene and -0.4th for pyrene, regardless of any energy irradiation, respectively. The discrepancy arising from these two analyses on reaction orders might suggest that there could be a certain ‘molecular agglomeration’ in extremely dilute solutions containing ‘solvent-repellent solute molecules.’ Also the ring cleavage reaction was found to be more retarded with higher ring numbers even if the rate gaps were small. Those findings drove us to speculate that hydrophobicity could increase as the hydrophobic PAH molecules swamped in order to form some kind of agglomerates. Consequently, the agglomeration and the number of aromatic rings were likely to be closely related to higher hydrophobicity exerted by them. Under this postulation we demonstrated an explanation that the reaction rate constants would decrease with increasing number of molecules partly due to agglomeration of hydrophobic molecules in aqueous environment. Ultrasonic irradiation was less effective than UV photolysis possibly owing to the larger energy dissipation.
  1. Miller JS, Olejnik D, Wat. Res., 35, 233 (2001)
  2. Maier M, Maier D, Lloyd BJ, Wat. Res., 34, 773 (2000)
  3. McElory AE, Farrington JW, Teal JM, In Metabolism of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Aquatic Environment, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL (1989)
  4. Malaney GW, Lutin PA, Cibulka JJ, Hickerson LH, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 39, 2020 (1968)
  5. Mattews RW, Wat. Res., 20, 569 (1986)
  6. Kim JH, Yoon KJ, Kim BK, J. KSSE, 18, 879 (1996)
  7. Kim JH, Lee MH, J. KSSE, 27, 224 (2005)
  8. Woo SH, Park JM, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 10(1), 16 (2004)
  9. Lim YM, Gwon HJ, Shin JW, Jeun JP, Nho YC, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 14(4), 436 (2008)
  10. Lehto KM, Puhakka JA, Lemmetyinen H, Biodegradation, 14, 249 (2003)
  11. Yun SM, Palanivelu K, Kim YH, Kang PH, Lee YS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 14(5), 667 (2008)
  12. Legrini O, Oliveros E, Braun AM, Chem. Rev., 93, 671 (1993)
  13. Mason TJ, Royal Soc. Chem., 1 (1990)
  14. Hwang SS, Park JS, Namkoong W, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 13(4), 650 (2007)
  15. Mo SY, Kim MS, Chang HK, Lee KJ, J. KSEE, 21, 325 (1999)
  16. Little C, Hepher MJ, EL-Sharif M, Ultrasonics, 40, 667 (2002)